germs, guns and steel

Why hasn't anyone tried to adapt science books for the screen? I don't mean science fiction. Like, why isn't there a film version of The God Delusion? Why hasn't anyone adapted Jared Diamond? I am pretty sure that a film version of The Dragons of Eden would be killer. I think the idea I am having now would incorporate other scientists talking about what they think about whatever scientist i choose to adapt. I am thinking in particular of the section in Michael Shermer's The Borderlands of Science where he examines the work of Carl Sagan mostly through the words and opinions of other scientists. Sagan is a hero to me, a consumer of popular science books, because he was one of the first to articulate science to a generally non-science audience. but how does the scientistic community view him? Some feel that he is a great populizer of science but a bad "hard" scientist. Others think of him as opportunistic and homophobic. I believe that I could turn that section into a film, perhaps something along the lines of F for Fake. maybe some of Shermer's arguments about the nature of human self-deception and how it is so easily exploited by charltans could tie into the themes of F for Fake, such as notions of authenticity and fakery. Wellse explored the material not in a documentary way, but also in a way that isn't quite fiction, either. It's some strange hybrid of the two. I think i could replicate some of the feelings and ideas that Wellse' film explores. Note to self: re-watch F for Fake. And read more of Peter Woit or find someone who can. His work is citical of string theory and Shermer has a section on that in The Borderlands of Science, too.

doubt as a tool for life

I realized a long time ago that I will always feel this way. Deep, profound doubt is just as relevant as deep, profound belief. And, paradoxically, by not expecting to find truth, you find that you actually are existing in truth at this very second. The only truth is your personal, subjective experience.

THE LIMITATION OF LIBERTARIANISM

(and, of course, its implications for my theory of practice)

I am down with libertarianism. I get it. People want to rule themselves and don't want a large, faceless governmental agency imposing its own moral framework on them. I voted for Badnarik in 2004, Barr in 2008. But why is it still focused on the idea that small communities are the best way to govern? What's wrong with taking it one or two more levels down, and stating that the individual should be totally autonomous? Why are we afraid of exercising utter control over our own lives? Why should I not be able to make my own, personal laws and monitor my own behavior?

This all, somehow, fits in with my ideal model for clinical psychiatric work. My therapy will begin with the liberation from god, the idea that some supernatural force is controlling your life. But it's going to go much smaller, and it will draw upon Thomas Szasz's idea that the happiest people are the ones who have assumed the most amount of control over their lives. I am interested in the impact of the individual on the social system, and the system's impact on the individual, and this is why I am studying social work and not psychology, but I am ultimately most interested in the equivalent of the cell in systems theory (that is, the individual, and what it means to be a totally unique person in the face of larger constructs). These ideas are not all that new, and probably the model I will end up treating people in will have parallels to existential therapy, but I still think by the time I get around to actually turning my ideas into a workable model for practice it will be something that is pretty original. Libertarianism and its focus on individual responsibility will be central to this; I will encourage people to do the opposite of most mental health treatment, which is to give up control.

At a very basic level, we are all making the choice, with every second of our existence, not to kill ourselves. Albert Camus claims this is the only true philosophical question. I hope to help more people realize this, and my aim is that the more people realize that they are choosing to assert their existence with every breath they take, the less sad those I am treating will feel, and that they will choose to see themselves as happy. Because happiness is a choice. It is not some abstract or concrete thing that you arrive at. You are happy right now, in so much as happiness exists; you just choose not to acknowledge this happiness.

The final goal of my therapy will be to encourage people to write their own set of laws, and then petition the larger government (whatever it looks like 30, 40 years from now) to become their own state. An island onto themselves. The best government is that which governs least; therefore, it makes sense to think that the best government is no government whatsoever.

And this is why I will only be able to really practice on a tiny self-sustaining farm in Vermont.

something i wrote for class

(I had to do a journal entry type reaction type thing to reading the DSM-IV. I guess most of my classmates are only reading it for the first time? Anyway, I didn't bother reading it because I've had my copy for years now, but I did write a journal entry and wanted to post it somewhere so here it is.)

What bothers me about the DSM is that as I'm reading it, I realize more and more how it is so clearly not based on science. I think rather than empowering individuals with mental disorders, the medical model has taken power away from them and convinced them that strict medication regiments and adherence to psychiatrists is the only way to get better. The DSM has done wonders to get psychotherapy covered by health insurance plans, but it has also lead to an increasing focus on funding, monetary aspects of the therapeutic relationship, constant updates to insurance companies who should, truthfully, really have no knowledge of their consumer's diagnoses and problems. It seems to me this has cheapened or compromised the counselor/consumer relationship. I am not uncertain that a totally private agreement between counselor/consumer is not the ideal situation in which to carry out treatment. Treating therapy as something that someone invests money and time in, I think, may lead to the consumer feeling more fullfiled and more willing to put work in and effect change in his/her life, as it is not a privlege bestowed upon the patient by the faceless insurance company, but rather a professional relationship that the consumer buys into (literally and figuratively). I am interested in the DSM and its contents and I own a copy, but I let it sit on the shelf on my office like an untouched family Bible; mere decoration, a reminder of a world gone by which I never really bought into in the first place.

overheard from my office earlier today.

"Hey, you wanna go get sushi?"
"Dude. I eat, like, cheese sticks."

feeling nostalgic.

Do you remember going to see THE OMEN remake the night it came out, driving around the parking lot, hearing someone blasting Iron Maiden's "Number of the beast" and laughing, out loud and at length, because we both loved that song and it was June 6, 2006, and I was done undergrad and we still had plans to maybe take over the world together if we didn't end up resenting each other first. but that's all changed now and you've got a kid and I'm still in school and we talked on the phone the other day and you said you're still feeling anxious but the depression is getting worse, and all i can think is, I told you so. I told you to deal with these things and I tried to help you. but more than anything, you taught me that I can't help anyone and no one wants to be saved by anyone other than themselves. That's our legacy, just the lessons I learned and faded memories for an us that doesn't exist anymore, maybe never did in the first place.

real talk

I miss my brother a lot. also i am drunk

your mouth my mouth our mouth

Tonight I sat in a chair and listened listened listened while people talked talked talked for three hours and there was nothing else for it so i listened while they talked some more. I imagined their words streaming out of their mouths in a stream and the words converged, merged, fed like rivers into the ocean and i was struck dumbfounded. Therapy is not a science so that means its an art, but there is no way to portray it in a visual sense so it'll never hang in a gallery. Perhaps one day when I'm famous (joke) I'll get a group of patients together and have an installation at a museum where we'll hold therapy in a public place and not a white-walled office (our frame, or canvas, or whatever) and people can sip martinis and smoke cloves and pay us lots and lots of money, but for now, it's confined to clinics. I listened and listened and listened and wished with all my heart that i could somehow see the soundwaves coming from their mouths, or that humans could hear in color, or something, ANYTHING to let me know that what i am creating will last.

Now I'm in my room smoking in the dark and watching the smoke congregate in the corners of my high ceilings and the smoke is pouring out of my mouth and it's no different than their words except it hangs around a little while longer. does this make sense to anyone but me.

grossly underqualified

One of the hardest aspects of counseling is that you can't just blurt out the first thing that comes to mind when a person tells you something. Last night in group, a consumer shared a traumatic experience from his/her childhood. I, being a clinician, asked the consumer if the consumer had ever been in intensive therapy, to properly process the emotions and issues attached to this trauma. Consumer states that consumer has been in therapy, once, and the therapist said, "Oh, you'll get over all this stuff in time" and just generally treated the situations (which is to say, the devastating events that effect the consumer's life in every way imaginable) as a stage, something that someone gets through. Well, yes, OK, that's true; most of the trauma from a person's life can be dealt with. But it can take years for a person to get there, and that one time in a therapist's office was enough for this particular consumer to make the decision to never go back.

A peer from the group responded to what I said, and stated, "Fuck the therapy, fuck the counseling, fuck 12 Stepping. You can do that for years, and what'll you get out of it? Nothing. You need to learn to forgive, and only church is going to give you that".

Now, my initial reaction was to tell the consumers that this is bullshit, and that any clergy member who was presented with the types of issues that this person is going through would direct the person to a therapist, because any clergy member knows that some things need to be handled in a clinical setting. My initial reaction was also to tell this person that religions are all phony and were created from hatred and continue to perpetuate generation after generation of hatred, all in the name of love. And also to tell them that god is a lie and that nothing they're really going through is happening anyway. And that I think drugs are OK in the context of controlled intake and that legalizing all narcotics, every single one, would solve a lot of this country's financial, social, racial, and legal problems.

But I can't say that. I can't say that because we're not friends and we are not having a conversation, and I think that's what most people don't realize about therapy. It's a relationship unlike any you'll experience elsewhere in life. Even if I were to share all of my problems with a priest, I wouldn't trust him to not tell anyone else the second we get out of the confessional booth. A therapist, on the other hand, has actual, physical accrediting and legal bodies to answer to, and that should be enough to ensure confidentiality and trust. But this consumer had a shitty experience with a shitty therapist, and that colored every experience and opinion of therapy that the consumer will hold, and then someone else goes and tells them that counseling won't work and only church will save you and the idea is reinforced in the person's mind.

The incident left kind of a bad taste in my mouth, but I couldn't relate that to the group. I just had to internalize it and process it myself, and I realized that I was doing a lot of inserting my own opinion into the mix, my personal opinions on religion and therapy, and that's not allowed. I don't give advice, I don't state my opinion, except when asked to, and I am not your friend. And I'm way too self-aware to know that every person's subjective experience determines how they interpret the world, and so for me therapy works and church doesn't and for other people the exact opposite is true and we're both OK. But it's hard not to say what I'm thinking, and even harder not to say what I'm feeling. And that's the reality of this work. Maybe the consumer could talk to a priest about what happened and that'd make it all better. I don't know.

Here's what I do know:

1. The consumer saw a shitty therapist who gave pat answers to a serious incident that had long-lasting repercussions in my consumer's life. The consumer saw this shitty therapist because the consumer has shitty health insurance provided by the state that only allows people to see shitty therapists in shitty, over-crowded, over-worked offices in the shittiest parts of the city. Clinicians get their licenses and flee from these shitty offices to open private practices in nicer parts of the city, and they accept only private insurances and they counsel housewives about boredom and stress and prescribe tons of medications and MAKE A KILLING. Here's the promise that I made myself while driving home last night, thinking about all of this: when I get my MSW and my license and I set up my private practice, I will continue to take low income consumers and provide them with quality counseling on a sliding scale basis, and I will market my practice to people who believe in the therapeutic process as much as I do, and if i don't make ends meet, oh well, at least I tried. There is no reason for every single person who wants therapy to not be provided with the highest quality experience possible, regardless of income (which naturally goes hand in hand with race). The most highly-trained, best-equipped counselors should not head for the suburbs, they should continue to help the people who truly need it and want it.

2. The counseling relationship ultimately leads to a power differential. I am not allowed to speak my mind or state my opinion. I am also the focal point of the group, the person that consumers turn to when conversation sputters out and the big, scary Silence sets in. I'm expected to always have an answer, or advice, and the truth is, I don't have any answers, and like I said before, I don't give advice. Perhaps evolutionary therapy has a place for totally honest communication between therapist and consumer? Perhaps there is a place for opinion from the therapist, and also the recognition that the therapist is just a person, not some authority figure granted with powers that you don't have.

3. I am a lucky person to be doing the job I'm doing, getting the experience that I am, and I'm also grossly under-qualified. Shhh!

camera

(Last week I made a promise to myself to start working on my screenplays every weekday. That lasted three days. Now I'm expanding my definition of workweek writing to include this blog, because I think it is important to write each day and to begin to think of writing as a "job" of sorts, even if I'm not getting paid for it yet. the effort to write each day is what's important and i don't think it matters so much whether the writing is on here or towards my screenplay or some other project entirely. So this is all part of an effort to just write as much as I possibly can, like I used to.)

This weekend I stood on a short stone pier at the beach where I spent most of my summers growing up. I didn't go too far out at first, because I am a neurotic person. The thought of stepping too far out on the pier scared me, brought about thoughts of mortality and anxiety and the things that I usually think about, but which seem intensified when facing raging oceans and breaking waves and unforgiving rocks. There was a small tower at the end of the pier, sending out a loud, beeping signal every couple of minutes. I stared at the tower and thought about walking up to it but decided against it. Because I'm neurotic. You know this.

I thought about the poems that I'd read on the beach and considered why it is that I am so afraid. Fear seems to run my life, not to mention in my family; fear of people and places and the unknown and death and everything else. There were quiet Asian families fishing off the side of the pier, and I thought about when I was younger, standing in this exact spot late at night with my father, and we were fishing then, too. I caught an eel, but in my 5 or 6 year old world, eels didn't exist. I'd never heard of them. So my initial reaction was to shout, "It's a sea monster!" My dad evaluated the creature and informed me that it wasn't a sea monster, just an eel. I felt silly asking what an eel is, and I'm sure he felt sillier when he just mumbled a response. "Oh, it's a fish, or...something?"

The ocean holds untold stories, presents the vacationer with new worlds that exist just below the surface. I got over my fear of the ocean early on and have loved the water ever since. But I'm always aware that the ocean is a mystery, and not really meant to house human beings. It is this awareness that colors my every experience. I am aware that it is not just the ocean that isn't meant to be home to humans, but this planet as a whole. We are aliens, or perhaps just vacationers enjoying a place that isn't ours, can't be ours. This planet belongs to the universe, and the universe belongs to no one, least of all us. The universe doesn't even belong to itself, because the very idea of "belonging" is a man-made construct. Property and ownership doesn't exist in nature. We divide up land and we also divide up stimuli received in our brain and label it to make sense of it. And you can take this line of thought further and further until you realize that our every perception is the result of some degree of measurement and interpretation. We are not really existing, just perceiving, and when the brain dies, show's over, folks, drive safe.

I stood at the end of that pier and I smoked a cigarette and I got my camera and just filmed things naturally occurring; a couple of boats drifting through the frame, waves breaking, the tower sounding its signal every minute or so. I went all the way to the end of the pier, fear be damned, and it was wet and slippery but I didn't fall in. I walked back from the pier and found my friend and my love but I was distant the rest of the weekend, as I tend to be, just stuck in my own head and not even sure of what's going on. I remembered when I first got my camera, I googled directions on how to clean the lens because I wasn't sure. A photographer had an online guide to cleaning lenses and stated that oftentimes amateur photographers will not shoot near water or sand or any other potentially camera-harming environments due to not wanting to damage their equipment. The author of the page stated that this results in a lot of great shots never being taken. The author encouraged the amateur photographer to seek out these locales and to take pictures, and if your equipment gets wet, fuck it, buy another. You'll always have the photos that you took, and they could live on beyond the camera, beyond the photographer, beyond the entire history of the universe. I imagine emailing myself a copy of the footage that I shot and that email leaving beamed to a satellite high above the earth, and then being shot back to earth, and there's a digital footprint left there. The digitized information exists between the earth and the satellite and it could exist forever, waiting to be picked up by a receiver anywhere in any point in time. This is comforting to me. And it occurs to me that this is what filmmaking can provide. It can encourage me to step out to the end of the pier, you're not going to fall in if you're careful and surefooted. The camera goes to places that I wouldn't otherwise consider going, but then when I do, it's not as bad as I thought it may be. And you receive beautiful images and they're captured forever and this is what it's all about.

Flirtations with Racism

1. Today I was giving this dude I work with (similar to me; white, glasses, facial hair, likes punk rock and metal) a ride and when we got into my car i was shocked to see that the music playing was Public Enemy's It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold us back. I had an instant moment where i freaked out and was like, did I do too much self-disclosure to a co-worker. does he think that i am secretly a black militant, or perhaps a Muslim? I hesitated to turn the music off instantly, and that would be the source of my next freak out. It didn't matter what I was playing; like I said, he was similar to me, culturally and also in terms of pop cultural frames of reference, so that meant he was down with the PE(" now every single bitch wanna see me"). But then I worried that my initial urge to turn the music off revealed the truly racist person that I am. Sure, my brain said inside my head, you'll listen to hip-hop in my car when you're alone, but bring another white person into the mix and you switch to bland jangly indie pop. And then I worried that my initial impulse to switch the music stemmed from my unconsciously thinking that because he is white, he must hate rap, thus making me and him both racist. this is the way my mind works. In the end, I played the first five tracks and switched it. That seemed safe. So am i racist or what?

2. I'm in the car with a black consumer at work, and i am just randomly flipping through radio stations. I land on a lil wayne track that i like but don't know the words to, so i can't like rap along or anything, so my participation seems perhaps like a stupid white liberal nod to solidarity (again, not saying there is any reason to interpret these events as I have; this is my purely subjective experience, and probably no one thinks I'm racist, and probably I'm not (though actually writing this sentence made me think that, yes, i am racist), so feel free to read this shit for entertainment purposes. I am just a neurotic, self-doubting, everything-else-doubting bro, yknow) and then I go to change the station, hesitate, and then fuck! actually do change it, and then I of course instantly worry that my changing the station revealed my true racist self, earlier when you were both singing along to the song, he was loving you, and then you changed the fucking station. Might as well join the KKK, you fucking RACIST. That's what i heard in my mind. And this is what I am stressing out about, all the time; nothing. And my work has taught me that ultimately most people spend a vast amount of their time freaking out about nothing, and I'm no different, so stop fucking freaking out about nonsense. But once I acknowledge that I'm freaking out about, and then I start to worry that I freak out over nothing, and then before I know it I am freaking out about how I am freaking out about nothing (and even this simple acknowledgment of my freaking out is proof that I know its senseless, but i'm still doing it in the moment). And this is what I love about humans, ultimately: our ability to contradict ourselves. Not every species of animal can do that. our ability to hold two positions in direct opposition to each other, and to argue them both, is an extension of our basic ability to feel conflicting emotions about ourselves, and the world around us. You might not know it but this is a pretty FUCKING AWESOME aspect of humanity and I urge you to start doubting everything, including my telling you how FUCKING AWESOME skepticism is. I am determined to just dive into the gray areas and doubt everything and then start to believe it all and believe none of it all in reaction to the believing and it's beautiful. So what i hope to catalogue here in a series of vignettes about my anxieties about my own racist tendencies. I'll start by stating that I do not believe I am a racist, at all, because I understand race in terms of biological and cultural roots and think that we the only differences that exist between us are purely man-made constructs, and a basic misunderstanding of evolution and biology in general. But maybe I'll feel differently about all this by the time I'm done. (I will never be done)

DR. REPP (v.o.): All culture and art and godheads and societies are attempts to make something permanent out of life, which is just an accident and an illusion, anyway. We strive, and we worry about it, and we want something, oh lord, something, please, solid in our lives. And then we die and all of time exists in a split second and we never even accept or learn to enjoy how short everything is. How this all could’ve just as easily not happened. We take existence for granted and talk of destiny and fate but the truth? This all could’ve just as easily not happened. And it probably didn’t anyway.